• Àüü
  • ÀüÀÚ/Àü±â
  • Åë½Å
  • ÄÄÇ»ÅÍ
´Ý±â

»çÀÌÆ®¸Ê

Loading..

Please wait....

±¹³» ³í¹®Áö

Ȩ Ȩ > ¿¬±¸¹®Çå > ±¹³» ³í¹®Áö > Çѱ¹Á¤º¸Ã³¸®ÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áö > Á¤º¸Ã³¸®ÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áö ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ¹× µ¥ÀÌÅÍ °øÇÐ

Á¤º¸Ã³¸®ÇÐȸ ³í¹®Áö ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ¹× µ¥ÀÌÅÍ °øÇÐ

Current Result Document :

ÇѱÛÁ¦¸ñ(Korean Title) ¿ä±¸»çÇ× ÃßÀû¼º °üÁ¡¿¡¼­ Ç×°ø±â žÀç ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î ½ÃÇè »ç·Ê ½ÇÆÐ ºÐ¼®
¿µ¹®Á¦¸ñ(English Title) Failure Analysis of Aircraft Software Test Cases from a Perspective of Requirements Traceability
ÀúÀÚ(Author) ±è¼º¼·   Á¶ÈñÅ   À̼±¾Æ   Sung-Sub Kim   Hee-Tae Cho   Seonah Lee  
¿ø¹®¼ö·Ïó(Citation) VOL 09 NO. 11 PP. 0357 ~ 0366 (2020. 11)
Çѱ۳»¿ë
(Korean Abstract)
Ç×°ø±â žÀç ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾îÀÇ ºñÁß ¹× º¹À⼺ Áõ°¡¿¡ µû¶ó, ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î °íÀåÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇÑ ÀÓ¹«¼öÇàÀ̳ª ±â´É ½ÇÆÐ ¹× ¼º´É ¹Ì´Þ µîÀÇ À§Çè¿äÀÎ ¶ÇÇÑ Áõ°¡ÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù. Ç×°ø±â žÀç ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾îó·³ ¹Ì¼Ç Å©¸®Æ¼Äà µµ¸ÞÀÎÀÇ ´ë±Ô¸ð ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î¿¡¼­ ÃÖ¼ÒÇÑÀÇ ±â°£°ú ºñ¿ëÀ¸·Î À¯Áöº¸¼ö¸¦ ÁøÇàÇϱâ À§Çؼ­ ´Â ¿ä±¸»çÇ× ÃßÀû°ü¸®°¡ ÇʼöÀûÀÌ´Ù. ÇÏÁö¸¸, °³¹ß¾÷ü¿¡¼­´Â °³¹ßºñ¿ëÀ̳ª °³¹ßÀÏÁ¤ µîÀÇ ¿©·¯ »çÀ¯·Î ÀÎÇØ ¿ä±¸»çÇ× ÃßÀû°ü¸® ÁöħÀ» Á¤È®È÷ ÁؼöÇÏÁö ¸øÇÏ°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ü°èÀûÀ¸·Î ÃßÀû¼º ¼ö¸³ È°µ¿À» ¼öÇàÇϱâ¶õ ½±Áö ¾Ê´Ù. ³í¹®¿¡¼­´Â ü°èÀûÀÎ ÃßÀû¼º ¼ö¸³ È°µ¿ÀÇ ºÎÀç¿¡ µû¸¥ ¿ä±¸»çÇ× ÃßÀû¼º ½ÇÆлç·Ê°¡ ½ÇÁ¦·Î Á¸ÀçÇÏ´ÂÁö Ç×°øºÐ¾ß ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾îÀÇ ½ÇÁ¦ ½ÃÇè»ç·Ê¸¦ ¿ä±¸»çÇ× ÃßÀû¼º °üÁ¡¿¡¼­ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ°í, ÃßÀû¼º ½ÇÆлç·ÊÀÇ À¯Çü°ú »ç¾È °æÁß¿¡ µû¸¥ À§ÇèÀ» È®ÀÎÇÑ´Ù. ÃÑ 7°³ÀÇ Ç×°ø±â žÀç ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®À» ÁøÇàÇÑ °á°ú, ½ÇÆлç·Ê´Â ÃÑ 3°¡Áö À¯ÇüÀÎ ¿ä±¸»çÇ× ´©¶ô, ¿ä±¸»çÇ×-½ÃÇèÀýÂ÷ ¿¬°èºÎÁ·, ½ÃÇèÀýÂ÷ ´©¶ôÀ¸·Î ³ª´­ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ½ÇÆлç·Ê´Â ÃÑ 18°ÇÀ¸·Î °¢ À¯Çüº° 6°Ç¾¿ ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç, °¢ »ç¾È¿¡ µû¸¥ Risk´Â High, Middle, Low ¼øÀ¸·Î °¢°¢ 1°Ç, 13°Ç, 4°ÇÀ¸·Î Áß°£ ¼öÁØÀÇ À§ÇèÀÌ °¡Àå ¸¹¾Ò´Ù
¿µ¹®³»¿ë
(English Abstract)
As the proportion and complexity of software embedded in aircraft increase, risk factors such as mission failure, function failure and performance failure due to software errors also increase. In the mission-critical software systems such as aircraft software, managing requirement traceability is essential to maintain the software systems with minimal period and cost. However, the development company is not accurately complying with the guideline for managing requirement traceability due to various reasons such as development cost and schedule. Therefore, it is not easy to systematically establish and maintain requirement traceability. In the paper, we analyze actual test cases of aviation software systems from the viewpoint of requirements traceability in order to learn if there are failure cases of test cases due to the absence of systematic traceability management activities. We also check the risks associated with the failure cases according to the type and severity of the cases. As a result of analyzing a total of 7 aircraft-mounted software, failure cases could be divided into three types: omission of requirements, lack of connection between requirements and test procedures, and omission of test procedures. There were a total of 18 failure cases, 6 for each type. The numbers of high, middle and low risks were 1, 13 and 4, respectively, where the number of middle risks is largest.
Å°¿öµå(Keyword) ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î °øÇР  Ç×°ø±â ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î   ¿ä±¸»çÇ× ÃßÀû¼º   ½ÃÇè »ç·Ê   Software Engineering   Aircraft Software   Requirement Traceability   Test Cases  
ÆÄÀÏ÷ºÎ PDF ´Ù¿î·Îµå